Music history and theory are the two main classroom classes of Sforzando String Camp every year. History is usually straight forward (there’s not too much complication one can get into with it).
This year, we covered Antonín Dvořák, Joseph Haydn, and Ralph Vaughn Williams. In addition to studying the lives of these composers, we also took a look into the form and instrumentation in the pieces we were playing by them.
Something new I learned about Haydn’s “Surprise” symphony (No. 94 in G Major; in German, it’s the symphony “mit dem Paukenschlag”) was that Haydn wrote it to outdo a student of his, Ignaz Pleyel. It worked. The audience attending the premiere of it at the Hanover Square Rooms, London, demanded an encore after hearing the second movement (which contains the surprise)… Second movements of symphonies are never encored. In symphony form, the second movement (usually out of four) is slower and calmer than any of the other movements.
One blessing in disguise that came from being late to camp was that neither Tyler or I had to take the greatly-feared Theory Test. We got to choose which theory class we wanted to be in — and we both chose Theory IV Composing.
Theory is my weakest point in music; I never really studied much of it until beginning lessons with my viola teacher around four years ago. While I can now (slowly) identify note names, key signatures, scale degrees, and chord inversions, I’m still not very good at it. Kinda ironic, since I love to compose music (hence why I chose the composing theory class).
Dr. Seth Custer shared some really good thoughts about utilizing different techniques in arranging and composing. He made the class practical by having everyone do a homework assignment, arranging “Shenandoah” and disguising the melody using various methods. On Thursday, he had four of us (including Tyler and I) put our compositions up on chalkboards, then proceeded to take them apart and examine what we had done.
Him doing that was quite helpful for me, in a couple ways. First, it showed me that there are a ton of ways that composing can be approached. Second, I got to step back to take a look at where I am with my composing skills, and what I need to study in order to improve.
I realized that I tend to be so afraid to overuse a theme, that I jump around way too much. There’s quite a bit of mileage to be pulled out of a musical theme, if one is to think about it and try different things.
Something else I realized is that I need to do more composing on good old staff paper, rather than relying on the computer all the time. Dr. Custer rightly said that a good composer can hear the music in his head.
And the last thing that was really driven home was that I need to dig into some theory topics and really get a hold on the mysteries of how music works. I’d like to start by really trying to get down keys, intervals, modes, scale degrees, etc., and also to diving into learning counterpoint (which I’ve used in my composing thus far, though ignorantly…).
To sum it up, I feel like I walked away from theory class this year with quite a bit. Now, I need to apply it.
Next post coming up: on other aspects of Sforzando.